Kim Soo-hyun's Statement - Differences in Stances on Relationship
by 씬디힐링2025. 3. 14.
반응형
A recent report by Garosero Research Institute (Gaseyeon) has intensified the controversy surrounding actor Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron. This controversy extends beyond a simple celebrity scandal, delving into the timeline of their relationship, contract penalties, financial responsibility, and privacy concerns, with significant discrepancies between the statements from both sides.
The following is a comparison of the positions held by Kim Soo-hyun’s side and the bereaved family, along with an analysis of key issues.
---
1. Timeline of the Relationship: Underage Dating Allegations
Bereaved Family's Claim
The bereaved family and Gaseyeon claim that Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had been in a relationship since 2016.
They cite a photograph allegedly taken in 2016, emphasizing that Kim Sae-ron was only 16 years old (a minor) at the time.
They also highlight a letter Kim Soo-hyun wrote to Kim Sae-ron during his military service, in which he used expressions like “I miss you”, suggesting they may have been romantically involved as early as 2016.
Kim Soo-hyun’s Rebuttal
Kim Soo-hyun’s side asserts that they were in a relationship only between the summer of 2019 and the fall of 2020, after Kim Sae-ron had reached adulthood.
The photograph in question was actually taken in the winter of 2020, and Kim Sae-ron was wearing clothes released in June 2019, which contradicts the claim that the picture was taken in 2016.
The letter from his military service was merely an exchange between acquaintances and did not imply any romantic involvement in 2016.
---
2. Kiss Photo: Discrepancy in the Shooting Date
Bereaved Family's Claim
Gaseyeon released a photo of the two kissing, claiming it was taken in 2016, which supports the allegation that Kim Soo-hyun had an inappropriate relationship with an underage Kim Sae-ron.
Kim Soo-hyun’s Rebuttal
The photo was actually taken on December 24, 2019 (Christmas Eve), when both were adults and in a relationship.
His agency possesses metadata from the original file that proves the picture was taken in 2019, not 2016.
The background and attire in the photo also confirm that it could not have been from 2016.
---
3. Contract Penalties: Who Was Responsible?
Bereaved Family's Claim
Following Kim Sae-ron’s DUI incident, she had to bear around 1.1 billion KRW (approximately $830,000) in contract penalties on her own.
After terminating her contract with her former agency (Gold Medalist), she continued to receive debt collection notices, leading to severe financial struggles.
On March 19, 2024, Kim Sae-ron allegedly texted Kim Soo-hyun asking for financial help, but he ignored her request.
Kim Soo-hyun’s Rebuttal
Out of the 1.1 billion KRW in contract penalties, Gold Medalist covered approximately 700 million KRW, significantly reducing Kim Sae-ron’s burden.
By December 2023, the agency wrote off the remaining debt as a loss, effectively clearing her financial obligations.
The legal process required an official debt collection attempt before the company could write off the debt, but Kim Sae-ron was never pressured to pay.
Kim Soo-hyun himself was not involved in any financial matters related to Kim Sae-ron. When he received a text from her, he was unaware of the situation and referred it to the agency.
---
4. Financial Responsibility Controversy
Bereaved Family's Claim
They argue that Kim Sae-ron’s extreme decision was partly due to her financial hardships, which Kim Soo-hyun ignored.
The claim suggests that Kim Soo-hyun failed to assist her, despite her reaching out to him for help in early 2024.
Kim Soo-hyun’s Rebuttal
Kim Soo-hyun never loaned money to Kim Sae-ron, nor did he demand repayment.
The text message Kim Sae-ron sent was due to a misunderstanding of legal procedures, and the agency had already resolved the situation.
By 2024, Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron had been separated for four years, and he was completely unaware of her financial issues.
---
5. Privacy Invasion Controversy
Bereaved Family's Claim
Gaseyeon justified its revelations by citing the public’s right to know and released private details about the relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron.
They argue that revealing the truth about their relationship is a matter of public interest, as Kim Sae-ron left behind records and photographs that allegedly support their claims.
Kim Soo-hyun’s Rebuttal
There is no concrete evidence to support the claim that Kim Soo-hyun engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a minor.
Unauthorized exposure of personal details, along with spreading false narratives, constitutes severe defamation.
While some of the released photos are real, they have been intentionally misrepresented and edited to fit a false narrative.
Kim Soo-hyun’s team is considering legal action to protect his privacy and refute misinformation.
---
Conclusion: Where Does the Truth Lie?
The controversy surrounding Kim Soo-hyun and the late Kim Sae-ron is no longer a simple celebrity scandal. It has evolved into a complex legal and ethical debate involving:
1. Relationship Timeline
Bereaved Family: Started in 2016 (when Kim Sae-ron was underage)
Kim Soo-hyun: Started in 2019 (after she became an adult)
2. Kiss Photo Date
Bereaved Family: Taken in 2016
Kim Soo-hyun: Taken on December 24, 2019
3. Contract Penalty & Financial Responsibility
Bereaved Family: Kim Sae-ron was left to deal with the financial burden alone, and Kim Soo-hyun ignored her
Kim Soo-hyun: The agency covered most of the penalty, and he was never personally involved
4. Privacy Invasion & Misinformation
Bereaved Family: Public has the right to know the truth
Kim Soo-hyun: False information and unauthorized leaks are damaging and defamatory
With ongoing legal threats and potential lawsuits, the case remains unresolved. Further evidence and official statements from both parties will determine the ultimate outcome of this highly publicized dispute.
댓글